Monday, March 31, 2008
Refrigerator Verse of the Day
Sunday, March 30, 2008
A Child of the 70's
Well not really. She was born in 2004. But if she had been born in the 70's she might dress like this. Friday we went to a party for a friend who turned 30. She was born in 1978 so her husband decided to have a 1970's themed party. We had a great time dressing up and dancing to disco. There was also a trivia game in which Tony McCollum dominated. He apparently spent a LOT of time watching television in the 70's. A groovin' time was had by all.
Saturday, March 29, 2008
Hello, Goodbye
-------------------------------------
Why Not Blog?
So, honestly, what does one talk about on a blog? Is this to be a political blog? a stream-of-consciousness collection of random daily thoughts? tech help? music reviews? family pictures? or what?
I have no idea. All I know is that, at times, I feel a desperate longing to express myself, to voice my opinions to the world whether it wants to hear them or not. Not a need to be accepted, necessarily, but a need to say something.
My biggest problem with this need is time. I spend at least 9 hours a day at work, with a 20+ minute commute each way, for a total of, usually, 10 or more hours away from home. After that, I ache to spend time with my family, and so I try to get in time to play with my young children before their bedtime, after which is finally some time alone with my wife. This time together typically concludes because we're both just physically exhausted and ready to stumble off to sleep. So, the songs in my heart, the novel ideas stirring around in my brain, the random thoughts that I might post on a blog, even the pictures of my children that I might post on a website for extended family and friends to enjoy, never come to fruition. And thus, we get a blog started in mid-November that isn't updated until late January. At nearly 1AM.
And so, I would like to give the full credit for this, my first real post on this blog, to the provider of tonight's Mochaccino, without whom I would not be awake right now. Thank you, Latté Da. (I was going to link to their website, but I can't find one, and I'm not staying up any later to try. Instead, I'm linking to a Mochaccino recipe. Enjoy.)
------------------
So, there you have it. To Holly, I don't know why you say goodbye; to Ren, I say hello.
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Monday, March 24, 2008
So Many Blogs, So Little Time
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Commitment Updates
UPDATE #2: Stayed up too late last night finishing a book I was reading. It was good, but I was 18.5 minutes late for work today. That's not good. I was solidly on time Monday, and within 5 minutes Tuesday and Wednesday. But today, not so good. Still, this is a process, and all I can do is take things one day at a time.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
To Kids, At Least, They Are
Saturday, March 15, 2008
Two Places at Once
Honoring Your Commitments
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
A Break in My Day
Today I got to enjoy some time with my kids at a park here in Athens. I had envisioned a peaceful walk by the lake, maybe, or at least a bit of tranquility and rest while the kids ran around and had a good time. And, for the most part, it was a serene little break in my day. There was one bit of fun that got to be a bit grating on the ol' ears, however. At least Maggie liked it…
Monday, March 10, 2008
Laser Fitness
Wednesday, March 05, 2008
Doing the Math
Before we started our Financial Peace University class, I decided to look around on the Internet and see if anyone had anything bad to say about Dave Ramsey, as I’d heard praise but no real criticism. One of the first things I found was an article entitled, “Dave Ramsey is Bad at Math.” This article talks about how it’s better mathematically (meaning you end up spending less money) to pay off your debts starting with the highest interest rate, then the next highest, and so on, as opposed to Dave’s plan of paying off the smallest debt first, then the next smallest, etc. The article also mentions a plan by a guy named David Bach, from his book, The Automatic Millionaire. I had actually read this book a couple of years ago, but I couldn’t remember what the debt-reduction plan was that he mentioned. That whole book was about putting all of your bills including house payments on automatic online bill-pay, establishing a retirement account that is taken directly out of your paycheck, and basically having your entire financial life go on “behind-the-scenes.” I’m pretty sure that the idea behind that is that if you have access to the money, you’ll waste it, but if you’ve set yourself up where all the aspects of your life that will lead you to get rich, what does it matter if you waste what’s left? Not too bad, I guess, and Dave’s overall plan also encourages and implements some of these ideas, but the debt-reduction scheme he recommends just seems odd (account balance divided by minimum payment, lowest ratio first), and the book seems to be aimed at people who are doing all right but just aren’t sure how to get rich by retirement. It doesn’t address the bad spending habits and poor choices that probably got us into debt in the first place. Anyway, the point I was going to make is that the “bad at math” article compares the 3 methods (percentage-based, Ramsey, and Bach) and concludes what is, perhaps, obvious: paying off based on interest rate gets you out of debt fastest and cheapest. The problem is, depending on what your debts look like, it may be quite a while before you ever start to feel like you’re making any progress. Whereas, on Dave’s plan, you can usually pay off the smallest debt relatively quickly, and the psychological boost of knowing that you can knock these things out and feeling like you’ve done something early in the process is huge. So, yes, Dave’s plan may not be the fastest, but it gives encouragement quickly, and potentially more often, than going based on percentages alone. Incidentally, nearly two years after the “bad at math” article, the author wrote another one, largely consisting of responses he received. It’s title is: “Dave Ramsey is Good at Psychology.”